Fincash » Nippon India Small Cap Vs L&T Emerging Businesses Fund
Table of Contents
Both Reliance small cap Fund and L&T Emerging Businesses Fund are small-cap category schemes offered by different fund houses. Though the category of both the schemes is same, yet they differ in terms of various factors such as performance, AUM, their current NAV and other related parameters. So, let us try to understand the differences between both the differences between Reliance Small Cap Fund and L&T Emerging Businesses Fund through this article.
Nippon India Small Cap Fund (Formerly known as Reliance Small Cap Fund) is offered by Nippon Mutual Fund and was incepted on September 16, 2010. The investment objective of the scheme is to attain long-term Capital growth by predominantly Investing the corpus in equity and equity-related instruments of small cap companies.
As on January 31, 2018, some of the stocks that constituted the top 10 holdings of Reliance Small Cap Fund’s Portfolio include Navin Fluorine International Limited, Deepak Nitrite Limited, RBL Bank Limited, and ITD Cementation India Limited.
From October 2019, Reliance Mutual Fund has been renamed as Nippon India Mutual Fund. Nippon Life has acquired majority (75%) stakes in Reliance Nippon Asset Management (RNAM). The company will continue to run its operations without any change in structure and management.
L&T Emerging Businesses Fund is an open-ended equity scheme that aims for long-term capital appreciation. It tries to attain its objective by forming a diversified portfolio mainly consisting of equity and equity-related instruments of the small-cap category. This scheme was launched on May 13, 2014. This scheme uses S&P BSE Small Cap Index to construct its portfolio.
As on January 31, 2018, some of the top 10 holdings of L&T Emerging Businesses Fund constituted of HEG Limited, Supreme Industries Limited, NOCIL Limited, and Grindwell Norton Limited.
The various comparison parameters between both these funds are classified into four sections. These sections are basics section, performance section, yearly performance section and other details section. So, let us understand how these funds are differentiated on the Basis of various parameters.
In this basics section, some of the comparable elements include Current NAV, Category, Fincash Ratings, AUM, expense ratio, and many more. To being with the category of both the schemes, they belong to the same category of Mid & Small-Cap Fund. With respect to Current NAV, it can be seen that the NAV of Nippon India/Reliance Small Cap Fund is higher as compared to L&T Emerging Businesses Fund.
As per Fincash Rating, we can see that L&T Emerging Businesses Fund has 5-Star Rating and Reliance Small Cap Fund has 4-Star Rating.
A summary of the parameters that are a part of the Basics Section is given below.
Parameters Basics NAV Net Assets (Cr) Launch Date Rating Category Sub Cat. Category Rank Risk Expense Ratio Sharpe Ratio Information Ratio Alpha Ratio Benchmark Exit Load Nippon India Small Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹147.715 ↑ 1.78 (1.22 %) ₹57,010 on 31 Jan 25 16 Sep 10 ☆☆☆☆ Equity Small Cap 6 Moderately High 1.55 0.26 0.78 3.88 Not Available 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL) L&T Emerging Businesses Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹72.0931 ↑ 1.09 (1.54 %) ₹17,386 on 31 Dec 24 12 May 14 ☆☆☆☆☆ Equity Small Cap 2 High 1.73 1.32 0.19 3.87 Not Available 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL)
This section compares the performance of both the schemes at different time periods. On a hindsight, it can be said that there is not much difference in the performance of both the funds at different time periods. Though in case of Performance since Inception, L&T Emerging Businesses Fund leads Nippon India/Reliance Small Cap Fund yet; in many other time periods, the performance of Nippon India Small Cap Fund has been better. With respect to 5 Year Returns, there is no data shown in case of L&T Emerging Businesses Fund as the fund has launched in May 2014. The table given below summarizes the data of performance section.
Parameters Performance 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year Since launch Nippon India Small Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details -11.9% -13.7% -16.7% 1.5% 20.9% 28.4% 20.4% L&T Emerging Businesses Fund
Growth
Fund Details -14.3% -15.2% -17% -2.1% 17.5% 25% 19.9%
Talk to our investment specialist
With respect to yearly performance, L&T Emerging Businesses Fund and Nippon India/Reliance Small Cap Fund both are almost performing the same. For the year 2016, however, L&T Emerging Businesses Fund performed better than Nippon India Small Cap Fund. The table given below shows the yearly performance of both the schemes.
Parameters Yearly Performance 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 Nippon India Small Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details 26.1% 48.9% 6.5% 74.3% 29.2% L&T Emerging Businesses Fund
Growth
Fund Details 28.5% 46.1% 1% 77.4% 15.5%
The other details section includes the differentiating parameters such as Minimum SIP and Lumpsum Investment. The minimum lumpsum investment in both the scheme is same that is, INR 5,000. However, the minimum SIP investment in case of Nippon India Mutual Fund is INR 100 and of L&T Emerging Businesses Fund is INR 500. The table showing the factors under other details section are listed below as follows.
The Fund managers managing the Nippon India Small Cap Fund are Mr. Samir Rachh and Mr. Dhrumil Shah.
Mr. S. N. Lahiri and Mr. Karan Desai are the fund managers managing L&T Emerging Businesses Fund.
Parameters Other Details Min SIP Investment Min Investment Fund Manager Nippon India Small Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹100 ₹5,000 Samir Rachh - 8.09 Yr. L&T Emerging Businesses Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹500 ₹5,000 Venugopal Manghat - 5.13 Yr.
Nippon India Small Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Jan 20 ₹10,000 31 Jan 21 ₹12,137 31 Jan 22 ₹20,946 31 Jan 23 ₹22,218 31 Jan 24 ₹34,818 31 Jan 25 ₹38,435 L&T Emerging Businesses Fund
Growth
Fund Details Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Jan 20 ₹10,000 31 Jan 21 ₹11,113 31 Jan 22 ₹19,683 31 Jan 23 ₹19,960 31 Jan 24 ₹30,763 31 Jan 25 ₹33,089
Nippon India Small Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 5.02% Equity 94.98% Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Industrials 25.71% Financial Services 12.92% Consumer Cyclical 12.68% Basic Materials 11.58% Technology 10.44% Health Care 7.75% Consumer Defensive 7.4% Utility 1.95% Communication Services 1.87% Energy 1.59% Real Estate 0.6% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity HDFC Bank Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 30 Apr 22 | HDFCBANK2% ₹1,179 Cr 6,650,000 Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 28 Feb 21 | MCX2% ₹1,154 Cr 1,851,010 Apar Industries Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Mar 17 | APARINDS1% ₹928 Cr 899,271 Kirloskar Brothers Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 12 | KIRLOSBROS1% ₹923 Cr 4,472,130 Dixon Technologies (India) Ltd (Technology)
Equity, Since 30 Nov 18 | DIXON1% ₹919 Cr 512,355 Tube Investments of India Ltd Ordinary Shares (Industrials)
Equity, Since 30 Apr 18 | TIINDIA1% ₹894 Cr 2,499,222 ELANTAS Beck India Ltd (Basic Materials)
Equity, Since 28 Feb 13 | 5001231% ₹785 Cr 614,625 State Bank of India (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 19 | SBIN1% ₹723 Cr 9,100,000 Central Depository Services (India) Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 18 | CDSL1% ₹709 Cr 4,029,718 Karur Vysya Bank Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 28 Feb 17 | 5900031% ₹690 Cr 31,784,062 L&T Emerging Businesses Fund
Growth
Fund Details Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 1.16% Equity 98.84% Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Industrials 30.48% Consumer Cyclical 16.51% Financial Services 14.26% Technology 10.64% Basic Materials 10.36% Real Estate 5.3% Health Care 4.2% Consumer Defensive 3.21% Energy 1.5% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity Apar Industries Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Mar 17 | APARINDS3% ₹470 Cr 455,400 BSE Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 29 Feb 24 | BSE3% ₹454 Cr 852,600
↓ -31,900 Dixon Technologies (India) Ltd (Technology)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 20 | DIXON2% ₹427 Cr 238,273 Neuland Laboratories Limited
Equity, Since 31 Jan 24 | -2% ₹410 Cr 299,000
↑ 17,978 Aditya Birla Real Estate Ltd (Basic Materials)
Equity, Since 30 Sep 22 | 5000402% ₹403 Cr 1,607,279 Techno Electric & Engineering Co Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 19 | TECHNOE2% ₹388 Cr 2,473,042 Kirloskar Pneumatic Co Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 22 | 5052832% ₹376 Cr 2,444,924 KFin Technologies Ltd (Technology)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 24 | KFINTECH2% ₹374 Cr 2,429,736
↑ 139,336 Trent Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 17 | 5002512% ₹338 Cr 474,400
↓ -63,150 Time Technoplast Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 24 | TIMETECHNO2% ₹336 Cr 6,810,500
↑ 656,671
Thus, we can conclude that both the schemes differ on various parameters. However, investors should be careful while choosing any scheme for investment. Individuals should check and confirm whether the scheme matches their investment objective or not. If required they can also consult a financial advisor and get their queries resolved before investing. This will help them to ensure that their money gives them the required results and the objectives are attained timely.
A nice and well detailed writeup.