Fincash » UTI Healthcare Fund Vs SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund
Table of Contents
UTI Healthcare Fund and SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fundis a comparative article that eases the option or process of choosing one fund of the same category for the investors. Both the funds belong to the same category of Mutual Funds- healthcare sector equity. sector funds are a type of mutual fund that invests in securities of specific sectors of the Economy, such as telecom, banking, FMCG, Information Technology (IT), healthcare pharmaceutical and infrastructure. Sector funds carry a higher Volatility than any other Equity Funds. As, high-risk comes with high-reward, sector funds seem to comply with it. So, let us understand the differences between UTI Healthcare Fund and SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund by comparing various parameters such as AUM, NAV, performance, and so on.
UTI Healthcare Fund, earlier known as UTI Pharma & Healthcare Fund, was launched in the year 1999. The aim of the fund is to seek Capital appreciation through investments in equities and related instruments of the Pharma & Healthcare sectors. Being a sector-specific fund, UTI Healthcare Fund comes under high-risk investment, thus, investors who can bear risk should only prefer Investing in this fund.
Some of the top holdings of the fund (as on 31st Jul'18) are Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd, Cipla Ltd, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Pfizer Ltd, Sanofi India Ltd, Ipca Laboratories Ltd, etc.
SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund, earlier known as SBI Pharma Fund, was launched in the year 2004. The fund aims to provide maximum growth opportunity by investing in equity investments in stocks of growth-oriented sectors of the economy. This fund carries high-risk, so investors with the same risk appetite should only prefer investing in this fund.
Some of the top holdings of the fund, as on 31st July 2018, are Cblo, Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd, Strides Pharma Science Ltd, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, etc.
Being the first section, it compares parameters such as current NAV, Fincash Rating, AUM, expense ratio, scheme category and many more. With respect to scheme category, both the schemes are a part of the same category, Sector Equity.
Based on Fincash Rating, it can be said that, UTI Healthcare Fund is rated as 1-Star scheme and SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund is rated as 2-Star scheme.
The comparison of the basics section is as follows.
Parameters Basics NAV Net Assets (Cr) Launch Date Rating Category Sub Cat. Category Rank Risk Expense Ratio Sharpe Ratio Information Ratio Alpha Ratio Benchmark Exit Load UTI Healthcare Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹286.377 ↓ -3.00 (-1.04 %) ₹1,203 on 30 Nov 24 28 Jun 99 ☆ Equity Sectoral 40 High 2.38 2.43 0.1 0.54 Not Available 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL) SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹429.202 ↑ 1.58 (0.37 %) ₹3,460 on 30 Nov 24 31 Dec 04 ☆☆ Equity Sectoral 34 High 2.09 2.85 0.75 5.08 Not Available 0-15 Days (0.5%),15 Days and above(NIL)
Being the second section, it analyses the differences in the Compounded Annual Growth Rate or CAGR returns of both the schemes. These CAGR returns are compared at different time intervals such as 1 Month Return, 6 Month Return, 5 Year Return, and Return since Inception. The comparison of CAGR returns reveals that in some instance UTI Healthcare Fund has performed better, while in some SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund has performed well. The table given below summarizes the comparison of the performance section.
Parameters Performance 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year Since launch UTI Healthcare Fund
Growth
Fund Details 2.9% -0.1% 21.8% 45.4% 22.1% 27.6% 15.3% SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details 4.2% 3.1% 20.4% 42.4% 25.4% 29.4% 16%
Talk to our investment specialist
The comparison of absolute returns generated by both the schemes for a particular year is done in the yearly performance section. The analysis of absolute returns shows that in most years SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund has performed well. The summary comparison of the yearly performance section is tabulated as follows.
Parameters Yearly Performance 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 UTI Healthcare Fund
Growth
Fund Details 38.2% -12.3% 19.1% 67.4% 1.2% SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details 38.2% -6% 20.1% 65.8% -0.5%
The minimum SIP Investment and minimum lumpsum investment are some of the parameters that form part of the other details section. The minimum lumpsum and SIP investment for both the schemes is the same, i.e., INR 5000 and INR 500, respectively. The table given below summarizes the comparison of other details section.
SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund is currently managed by Tanmaya Desai.
UTI Healthcare Fund is currently managed by V Srivatsa.
Parameters Other Details Min SIP Investment Min Investment Fund Manager UTI Healthcare Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹500 ₹5,000 Kamal Gada - 2.59 Yr. SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹500 ₹5,000 Tanmaya Desai - 13.51 Yr.
UTI Healthcare Fund
Growth
Fund Details Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 30 Nov 19 ₹10,000 30 Nov 20 ₹15,670 30 Nov 21 ₹19,186 30 Nov 22 ₹18,040 30 Nov 23 ₹23,340 30 Nov 24 ₹33,757 SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 30 Nov 19 ₹10,000 30 Nov 20 ₹15,482 30 Nov 21 ₹18,848 30 Nov 22 ₹19,211 30 Nov 23 ₹24,570 30 Nov 24 ₹35,381
UTI Healthcare Fund
Growth
Fund Details Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 2.12% Equity 97.88% Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Health Care 96.07% Basic Materials 1.42% Financial Services 0.39% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 06 | SUNPHARMA11% ₹129 Cr 725,000 Cipla Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 03 | CIPLA6% ₹69 Cr 450,660 Ajanta Pharma Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 17 | AJANTPHARM5% ₹58 Cr 193,047
↓ -15,318 Dr Reddy's Laboratories Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 28 Feb 18 | DRREDDY5% ₹57 Cr 470,234
↑ 34,734 Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Mar 24 | GLENMARK4% ₹47 Cr 309,311
↑ 58,980 Gland Pharma Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 30 Nov 20 | GLAND4% ₹46 Cr 266,306 Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 30 Apr 21 | APOLLOHOSP3% ₹41 Cr 60,000 Fortis Healthcare Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 20 | FORTIS3% ₹40 Cr 611,658
↓ -22,787 Procter & Gamble Health Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 20 | PGHL3% ₹38 Cr 74,000 Divi's Laboratories Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 30 Sep 17 | DIVISLAB3% ₹38 Cr 61,480 SBI Healthcare Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 3.5% Equity 96.5% Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Health Care 89.92% Basic Materials 6.58% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 17 | SUNPHARMA13% ₹445 Cr 2,500,000
↑ 100,000 Divi's Laboratories Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Mar 12 | DIVISLAB6% ₹222 Cr 360,000 Cipla Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 16 | CIPLA6% ₹196 Cr 1,280,000
↑ 280,000 Max Healthcare Institute Ltd Ordinary Shares (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Mar 21 | MAXHEALTH6% ₹196 Cr 2,000,000
↓ -100,000 Lupin Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 23 | LUPIN5% ₹164 Cr 800,000 Lonza Group Ltd ADR (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 24 | LZAGY4% ₹152 Cr 300,000 Poly Medicure Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 24 | POLYMED4% ₹139 Cr 500,000
↓ -140,000 Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 30 Nov 22 | 5433084% ₹130 Cr 2,200,000
↓ -300,000 Jupiter Life Line Hospitals Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 23 | JLHL4% ₹126 Cr 832,871
↓ -67,129 Aether Industries Ltd (Basic Materials)
Equity, Since 31 May 22 | 5435343% ₹115 Cr 1,400,000
Therefore, in a nutshell, it can be said that both the schemes differ on account of numerous parameters. As a consequence, individuals should be very careful while choosing any of the schemes for investment. They should understand the modalities of the scheme completely and check whether the scheme matches their investment parameters or not. This will help individuals to attain their objectives on time and in a hassle-free manner.