Table of Contents
SIPs Vs Lump sum Investing? There are various articles that say systematic investment plans(or SIPs) are the best route to be taken for investing in Mutual Funds. Various SIP calculators help you plan for that goal, many websites, and financial planners will also advocate the Top SIP plans to invest. Most will talk about rupee cost averaging & the benefits of SIPs, stating that getting into the stock Market via lump sum investment may not be the best way. While one may get into the best mutual fund for SIP, can one expect better returns than lump sum investing by using SIP as the investing mode?
Investing is always about the ability to generate returns. Whether it's a lump sum investment or a systematic Investment plan, one needs to be prudent and make the correct decisions. Investing in Mutual Funds is not always about selecting the best mutual funds or the Best SIP Plans. There is much more that needs to be considered. Especially, if one is thinking about investing in the equity markets, one needs to be even more careful. An analysis of the stock market (taking the BSE Sensex as the benchmark) yields that the chance of making returns increases if one stays invested for a long term. As one can see from the table below, if one just goes by numbers, there is a 30% chance that you may make a loss if you plan to stay invested in the stock market for only 1 year.
Hence most advisors when talking about equity investments would always relate to equities with "long term investing". If one plans to stay invested for 5 years the probability to make loss drops to 13%. And if one is truly long-term ( more than 10 years), than the ability to make a loss tends towards zero. Hence, if one is really interested in making money from the stock market, its all about spending time in the stock market. (rather than marking timing!)
It's quite clear that investing in the equity markets is a long-term game. A lot of people advocate that the benefits of SIPs extend from rupee cost averaging to disciplined investing, but there is a bigger question to be answered, do SIPs deliver better returns than lump sum investing?
We tried to get a deeper understanding of this question by looking at the equity markets since 1979 (since the inception of the BSE Sensex). The BSE Sensex is a composition of the top 30 companies in India and is a representation of the equity market. Analysing this data, we could get some insights to see if SIPs or lump sum, which is better.
Talk to our investment specialist
The worst period to start investing was around September 1994 (this was the time when the stock market had peaked). In fact, if one looks at market data the investor who had invested a lump sum sat on negative returns for 59 months( nearly 5 years!). The investor broke even in about July of 1999. The next year though some returns were generated, these returns were short lived due to the 2000 stock market crash subsequently. After suffering for another 4 years (with negative returns) and the investor finally became positive in October 2003. This was possibly the worst time to have invested a lump sum.
What happened to the SIP investor? The systematic Investment Plan investor was negative for only 19 months and started posting profits, however, these were short-lived. The SIP investors were up again by May 1999 after suffering interim losses. While the journey still continued to be shaky, SIP investors showed profits in the Portfolio much earlier. The maximum loss for the lump sum investor was nearly 40%, whereas for the SIP investor was 23%. The systematic investment plan investor had a faster recovery period as well as a lower loss in the portfolio.
Another very gloomy period to start investing was around March 2000 (this was the time when the stock market had peaked, again!). In fact, if one looks at market data the investor who had invested a lump sum sat on negative returns for 45 months straight( nearly 4 years!). The investor broke even in about of December of 2003. The next year though some returns were generated, these returns were short lived due to a slip again in 2004. After suffering for another 1 year, the investor finally became positive in September 2004. This was another bad time to have invested a lump sum.
What was the story of the SIP investor who started investing in March of 2000? If one invested monthly sums of equal amounts, the investor was positive in June 2003 and by September 2004, the portfolio was up 45% overall. (when the lump sum investor was breaking even). Another aspect to note is the maximum loss, the lump sum investor has suffered a nearly 50% loss by September 2001, comparatively, the SIP portfolio loss was 28% at the same time.
What we can get from the above is that when the stock market is in for a bad period, it's always better to be in a SIP since the recovery is faster and also one sees lower losses in the portfolio too.
Looking at the last 37 years data of the stock market from 1979 to 2016, one deciphers that if one invested early on (1979 - inception time of the BSE Sensex), one hardly saw any negative returns in the portfolio.
A 5-year analysis from August 1979 shows that both the lump sum and Systematic Investment Plan portfolios posted hardly any loss in any time period from there. As one can see from the graph below, both portfolios posted handsome profits year-on-year. At the end of every year, the lump sum portfolio overtook the SIP portfolio and increased the lead margin too.
Hence, in case the market is expected to go one way up, the lump sum is always the better option.
While we can analyse all periods of the stock market, can we really decide which is better? The answer to this varies from individual to individual, the cash flows, investing(or holding) periods, outgoing cash flows or requirements etc. SIPs are a great tool to inculcate the habit of savings, they channelize the investment of individuals into the stock market. One also has to plan for investing for the long term if you plan to invest in equities, where we clearly know that the ability to generate returns increases with time. Also, if one feels the markets may be choppy and not a straight line up, then SIPs are a great tool to enter the market. Additionally, data shows that SIPs also ensure that the investor suffers lower losses at any time.
In case there is feeling that the market would be secular (one way!) on the upside, in that situation, lump sum investing would be the way to go.
"The primary investment objective of the Scheme is to seek capital appreciation by investing predominantly in units of MLIIF - WGF. The Scheme may, at the discretion of the Investment Manager, also invest in the units of other similar overseas mutual fund schemes, which may constitute a significant part of its corpus. The Scheme may also invest a certain portion of its corpus in money market securities and/or units of money market/liquid schemes of DSP Merrill Lynch Mutual Fund, in order to meet liquidity requirements from time to time. However, there is no assurance that the investment objective of the Scheme will be realized." DSP BlackRock World Gold Fund is a Equity - Global fund was launched on 14 Sep 07. It is a fund with High risk and has given a Below is the key information for DSP BlackRock World Gold Fund Returns up to 1 year are on The primary objective of the Scheme is to achieve long-term capital appreciation by investing in equity & equity related instruments of mid cap & small cap companies. Principal Emerging Bluechip Fund is a Equity - Large & Mid Cap fund was launched on 12 Nov 08. It is a fund with Moderately High risk and has given a Below is the key information for Principal Emerging Bluechip Fund Returns up to 1 year are on The investment objective of the scheme is to provide long term growth from a portfolio of equity / equity related instruments of companies engaged either directly or indirectly in the infrastructure sector. LIC MF Infrastructure Fund is a Equity - Sectoral fund was launched on 29 Feb 08. It is a fund with High risk and has given a Below is the key information for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund Returns up to 1 year are on (Erstwhile Motilal Oswal MOSt Focused Midcap 30 Fund) The investment objective of the Scheme is to achieve long term capital appreciation by investing in a maximum of 30 quality mid-cap companies having long-term competitive advantages and potential for growth. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that the investment objective of the Scheme would be achieved. Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund is a Equity - Mid Cap fund was launched on 24 Feb 14. It is a fund with Moderately High risk and has given a Below is the key information for Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund Returns up to 1 year are on (Erstwhile UTI Pharma & Healthcare Fund) The Investment objective of the Scheme is capital appreciation through investments in equities and equity related instruments of the Pharma & Healthcare sectors. UTI Healthcare Fund is a Equity - Sectoral fund was launched on 28 Jun 99. It is a fund with High risk and has given a Below is the key information for UTI Healthcare Fund Returns up to 1 year are on 1. DSP BlackRock World Gold Fund
CAGR/Annualized
return of 4.5% since its launch. Ranked 11 in Global
category. Return for 2024 was 15.9% , 2023 was 7% and 2022 was -7.7% . DSP BlackRock World Gold Fund
Growth Launch Date 14 Sep 07 NAV (17 Jan 25) ₹21.5746 ↓ -0.17 (-0.79 %) Net Assets (Cr) ₹947 on 31 Dec 24 Category Equity - Global AMC DSP BlackRock Invmt Managers Pvt. Ltd. Rating ☆☆☆ Risk High Expense Ratio 1.35 Sharpe Ratio 0.41 Information Ratio -0.29 Alpha Ratio 3.62 Min Investment 1,000 Min SIP Investment 500 Exit Load 0-12 Months (1%),12 Months and above(NIL) Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Dec 19 ₹10,000 31 Dec 20 ₹13,141 31 Dec 21 ₹11,960 31 Dec 22 ₹11,045 31 Dec 23 ₹11,815 31 Dec 24 ₹13,698 Returns for DSP BlackRock World Gold Fund
absolute basis
& more than 1 year are on CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)
basis. as on 17 Jan 25 Duration Returns 1 Month 4.2% 3 Month -7.6% 6 Month 1.8% 1 Year 41.2% 3 Year 8.5% 5 Year 8.4% 10 Year 15 Year Since launch 4.5% Historical performance (Yearly) on absolute basis
Year Returns 2023 15.9% 2022 7% 2021 -7.7% 2020 -9% 2019 31.4% 2018 35.1% 2017 -10.7% 2016 -4% 2015 52.7% 2014 -18.5% Fund Manager information for DSP BlackRock World Gold Fund
Name Since Tenure Jay Kothari 1 Mar 13 11.84 Yr. Data below for DSP BlackRock World Gold Fund as on 31 Dec 24
Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Basic Materials 93.09% Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 3.02% Equity 93.33% Debt 0.01% Other 3.65% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity BGF World Gold I2
Investment Fund | -82% ₹852 Cr 2,040,186
↓ -25,142 VanEck Gold Miners ETF
- | GDX17% ₹183 Cr 573,719 Treps / Reverse Repo Investments
CBLO/Reverse Repo | -1% ₹15 Cr Net Receivables/Payables
Net Current Assets | -0% -₹4 Cr 2. Principal Emerging Bluechip Fund
CAGR/Annualized
return of 24.8% since its launch. Ranked 1 in Large & Mid Cap
category. . Principal Emerging Bluechip Fund
Growth Launch Date 12 Nov 08 NAV (31 Dec 21) ₹183.316 ↑ 2.03 (1.12 %) Net Assets (Cr) ₹3,124 on 30 Nov 21 Category Equity - Large & Mid Cap AMC Principal Pnb Asset Mgmt. Co. Priv. Ltd. Rating ☆☆☆☆☆ Risk Moderately High Expense Ratio 2.08 Sharpe Ratio 2.74 Information Ratio 0.22 Alpha Ratio 2.18 Min Investment 5,000 Min SIP Investment 100 Exit Load 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL) Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Dec 19 ₹10,000 31 Dec 20 ₹12,230 Returns for Principal Emerging Bluechip Fund
absolute basis
& more than 1 year are on CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)
basis. as on 17 Jan 25 Duration Returns 1 Month 2.9% 3 Month 2.9% 6 Month 13.6% 1 Year 38.9% 3 Year 21.9% 5 Year 19.2% 10 Year 15 Year Since launch 24.8% Historical performance (Yearly) on absolute basis
Year Returns 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Fund Manager information for Principal Emerging Bluechip Fund
Name Since Tenure Data below for Principal Emerging Bluechip Fund as on 30 Nov 21
Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity 3. LIC MF Infrastructure Fund
CAGR/Annualized
return of 9.7% since its launch. Return for 2024 was 47.8% , 2023 was 44.4% and 2022 was 7.9% . LIC MF Infrastructure Fund
Growth Launch Date 29 Feb 08 NAV (21 Jan 25) ₹47.6258 ↓ -0.74 (-1.54 %) Net Assets (Cr) ₹927 on 31 Dec 24 Category Equity - Sectoral AMC LIC Mutual Fund Asset Mgmt Co Ltd Rating Risk High Expense Ratio 2.3 Sharpe Ratio 2.11 Information Ratio 1.13 Alpha Ratio 26.65 Min Investment 5,000 Min SIP Investment 1,000 Exit Load 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL) Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Dec 19 ₹10,000 31 Dec 20 ₹9,987 31 Dec 21 ₹14,642 31 Dec 22 ₹15,802 31 Dec 23 ₹22,821 31 Dec 24 ₹33,727 Returns for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund
absolute basis
& more than 1 year are on CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)
basis. as on 17 Jan 25 Duration Returns 1 Month -7.1% 3 Month -6.2% 6 Month -4.1% 1 Year 33.4% 3 Year 27.4% 5 Year 25.1% 10 Year 15 Year Since launch 9.7% Historical performance (Yearly) on absolute basis
Year Returns 2023 47.8% 2022 44.4% 2021 7.9% 2020 46.6% 2019 -0.1% 2018 13.3% 2017 -14.6% 2016 42.2% 2015 -2.2% 2014 -6.2% Fund Manager information for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund
Name Since Tenure Yogesh Patil 18 Sep 20 4.29 Yr. Mahesh Bendre 1 Jul 24 0.5 Yr. Data below for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund as on 31 Dec 24
Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Industrials 50.6% Basic Materials 11.02% Consumer Cyclical 9.84% Utility 7.43% Financial Services 6.38% Technology 3.93% Real Estate 1.91% Communication Services 1.88% Energy 1.29% Health Care 0.2% Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 5.52% Equity 94.48% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity Garware Hi-Tech Films Ltd (Basic Materials)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 23 | 5006555% ₹43 Cr 86,410 Shakti Pumps (India) Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Mar 24 | SHAKTIPUMP4% ₹31 Cr 391,152 REC Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 23 | RECLTD3% ₹28 Cr 525,720
↑ 92,998 Schneider Electric Infrastructure Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 23 | SCHNEIDER3% ₹27 Cr 328,026 Cummins India Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 May 21 | CUMMINSIND3% ₹23 Cr 66,145 ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 24 | 5330333% ₹21 Cr 149,711 GE Vernova T&D India Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 24 | 5222752% ₹21 Cr 120,063 Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 May 24 | BHEL2% ₹21 Cr 838,269 Texmaco Rail & Engineering Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 30 Nov 23 | TEXRAIL2% ₹20 Cr 944,309
↑ 75,376 Bharat Bijlee Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 22 | BBL2% ₹20 Cr 51,606
↑ 4,281 4. Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund
CAGR/Annualized
return of 23.2% since its launch. Ranked 27 in Mid Cap
category. Return for 2024 was 57.1% , 2023 was 41.7% and 2022 was 10.7% . Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund
Growth Launch Date 24 Feb 14 NAV (21 Jan 25) ₹97.1193 ↓ -4.25 (-4.20 %) Net Assets (Cr) ₹26,421 on 31 Dec 24 Category Equity - Mid Cap AMC Motilal Oswal Asset Management Co. Ltd Rating ☆☆☆ Risk Moderately High Expense Ratio 0.66 Sharpe Ratio 2.67 Information Ratio 1.32 Alpha Ratio 25.93 Min Investment 5,000 Min SIP Investment 500 Exit Load 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL) Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Dec 19 ₹10,000 31 Dec 20 ₹10,932 31 Dec 21 ₹17,035 31 Dec 22 ₹18,859 31 Dec 23 ₹26,719 31 Dec 24 ₹41,984 Returns for Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund
absolute basis
& more than 1 year are on CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)
basis. as on 17 Jan 25 Duration Returns 1 Month -11.9% 3 Month -7.9% 6 Month 0.7% 1 Year 31.4% 3 Year 28.2% 5 Year 28.5% 10 Year 15 Year Since launch 23.2% Historical performance (Yearly) on absolute basis
Year Returns 2023 57.1% 2022 41.7% 2021 10.7% 2020 55.8% 2019 9.3% 2018 9.7% 2017 -12.7% 2016 30.8% 2015 5.2% 2014 16.5% Fund Manager information for Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund
Name Since Tenure Ajay Khandelwal 1 Oct 24 0.25 Yr. Niket Shah 1 Jul 20 4.51 Yr. Santosh Singh 1 Oct 24 0.25 Yr. Rakesh Shetty 22 Nov 22 2.11 Yr. Sunil Sawant 1 Jul 24 0.5 Yr. Data below for Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund as on 31 Dec 24
Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Consumer Cyclical 37.33% Technology 24.3% Industrials 20.33% Financial Services 6.71% Health Care 3.21% Basic Materials 3.07% Communication Services 2.24% Real Estate 2.2% Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 0.61% Equity 99.39% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity Polycab India Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 30 Sep 23 | POLYCAB10% ₹2,281 Cr 3,125,018
↑ 250,018 Coforge Ltd (Technology)
Equity, Since 31 Mar 23 | COFORGE10% ₹2,258 Cr 2,600,000 Kalyan Jewellers India Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 29 Feb 24 | KALYANKJIL10% ₹2,210 Cr 30,500,000
↑ 1,516,281 Zomato Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 30 Apr 23 | 5433209% ₹2,168 Cr 77,500,000
↑ 45,000,000 Persistent Systems Ltd (Technology)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 23 | PERSISTENT8% ₹1,772 Cr 3,000,000 Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 24 | M&M6% ₹1,409 Cr 4,750,000
↑ 944,245 Jio Financial Services Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 23 | JIOFIN6% ₹1,395 Cr 42,500,000
↓ -7,500,000 Trent Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 30 Nov 24 | TRENT5% ₹1,189 Cr 1,749,600
↑ 1,749,600 Bajaj Auto Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 24 | BAJAJ-AUTO4% ₹1,016 Cr 1,125,000
↓ -242,958 Voltas Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 17 | VOLTAS4% ₹829 Cr 4,999,745
↓ -255 5. UTI Healthcare Fund
CAGR/Annualized
return of 15.1% since its launch. Ranked 40 in Sectoral
category. Return for 2024 was 42.9% , 2023 was 38.2% and 2022 was -12.3% . UTI Healthcare Fund
Growth Launch Date 28 Jun 99 NAV (21 Jan 25) ₹277.819 ↓ -2.49 (-0.89 %) Net Assets (Cr) ₹1,236 on 31 Dec 24 Category Equity - Sectoral AMC UTI Asset Management Company Ltd Rating ☆ Risk High Expense Ratio 2.38 Sharpe Ratio 2.32 Information Ratio -0.22 Alpha Ratio -0.45 Min Investment 5,000 Min SIP Investment 500 Exit Load 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL) Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Dec 19 ₹10,000 31 Dec 20 ₹16,736 31 Dec 21 ₹19,930 31 Dec 22 ₹17,475 31 Dec 23 ₹24,150 31 Dec 24 ₹34,500 Returns for UTI Healthcare Fund
absolute basis
& more than 1 year are on CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)
basis. as on 17 Jan 25 Duration Returns 1 Month -3% 3 Month -2.6% 6 Month 13.2% 1 Year 31.4% 3 Year 20.3% 5 Year 25.8% 10 Year 15 Year Since launch 15.1% Historical performance (Yearly) on absolute basis
Year Returns 2023 42.9% 2022 38.2% 2021 -12.3% 2020 19.1% 2019 67.4% 2018 1.2% 2017 -7.5% 2016 6.2% 2015 -9.7% 2014 12.4% Fund Manager information for UTI Healthcare Fund
Name Since Tenure Kamal Gada 2 May 22 2.67 Yr. Data below for UTI Healthcare Fund as on 31 Dec 24
Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Health Care 96.03% Basic Materials 1.27% Financial Services 0.29% Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 2.41% Equity 97.59% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 06 | SUNPHARMA11% ₹129 Cr 725,000 Cipla Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 03 | CIPLA6% ₹69 Cr 450,660 Ajanta Pharma Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 17 | AJANTPHARM5% ₹58 Cr 193,047
↓ -15,318 Dr Reddy's Laboratories Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 28 Feb 18 | DRREDDY5% ₹57 Cr 470,234
↑ 34,734 Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Mar 24 | GLENMARK4% ₹47 Cr 309,311
↑ 58,980 Gland Pharma Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 30 Nov 20 | GLAND4% ₹46 Cr 266,306 Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 30 Apr 21 | APOLLOHOSP3% ₹41 Cr 60,000 Fortis Healthcare Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 20 | FORTIS3% ₹40 Cr 611,658
↓ -22,787 Procter & Gamble Health Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 20 | PGHL3% ₹38 Cr 74,000 Divi's Laboratories Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 30 Sep 17 | DIVISLAB3% ₹38 Cr 61,480
The final choice to invest via the lump sum route or SIPs would be a culmination of many factors, however, the investor needs to take into account all these and his/her risk appetite to choose the best route. Choose well, choose wisely, stay invested!