Table of Contents
SIPs Vs Lump sum Investing? There are various articles that say systematic investment plans(or SIPs) are the best route to be taken for investing in Mutual Funds. Various SIP calculators help you plan for that goal, many websites, and financial planners will also advocate the Top SIP plans to invest. Most will talk about rupee cost averaging & the benefits of SIPs, stating that getting into the stock Market via lump sum investment may not be the best way. While one may get into the best mutual fund for SIP, can one expect better returns than lump sum investing by using SIP as the investing mode?
Investing is always about the ability to generate returns. Whether it's a lump sum investment or a systematic Investment plan, one needs to be prudent and make the correct decisions. Investing in Mutual Funds is not always about selecting the best mutual funds or the Best SIP Plans. There is much more that needs to be considered. Especially, if one is thinking about investing in the equity markets, one needs to be even more careful. An analysis of the stock market (taking the BSE Sensex as the benchmark) yields that the chance of making returns increases if one stays invested for a long term. As one can see from the table below, if one just goes by numbers, there is a 30% chance that you may make a loss if you plan to stay invested in the stock market for only 1 year.
Hence most advisors when talking about equity investments would always relate to equities with "long term investing". If one plans to stay invested for 5 years the probability to make loss drops to 13%. And if one is truly long-term ( more than 10 years), than the ability to make a loss tends towards zero. Hence, if one is really interested in making money from the stock market, its all about spending time in the stock market. (rather than marking timing!)
It's quite clear that investing in the equity markets is a long-term game. A lot of people advocate that the benefits of SIPs extend from rupee cost averaging to disciplined investing, but there is a bigger question to be answered, do SIPs deliver better returns than lump sum investing?
We tried to get a deeper understanding of this question by looking at the equity markets since 1979 (since the inception of the BSE Sensex). The BSE Sensex is a composition of the top 30 companies in India and is a representation of the equity market. Analysing this data, we could get some insights to see if SIPs or lump sum, which is better.
Talk to our investment specialist
The worst period to start investing was around September 1994 (this was the time when the stock market had peaked). In fact, if one looks at market data the investor who had invested a lump sum sat on negative returns for 59 months( nearly 5 years!). The investor broke even in about July of 1999. The next year though some returns were generated, these returns were short lived due to the 2000 stock market crash subsequently. After suffering for another 4 years (with negative returns) and the investor finally became positive in October 2003. This was possibly the worst time to have invested a lump sum.
What happened to the SIP investor? The systematic Investment Plan investor was negative for only 19 months and started posting profits, however, these were short-lived. The SIP investors were up again by May 1999 after suffering interim losses. While the journey still continued to be shaky, SIP investors showed profits in the Portfolio much earlier. The maximum loss for the lump sum investor was nearly 40%, whereas for the SIP investor was 23%. The systematic investment plan investor had a faster recovery period as well as a lower loss in the portfolio.
Another very gloomy period to start investing was around March 2000 (this was the time when the stock market had peaked, again!). In fact, if one looks at market data the investor who had invested a lump sum sat on negative returns for 45 months straight( nearly 4 years!). The investor broke even in about of December of 2003. The next year though some returns were generated, these returns were short lived due to a slip again in 2004. After suffering for another 1 year, the investor finally became positive in September 2004. This was another bad time to have invested a lump sum.
What was the story of the SIP investor who started investing in March of 2000? If one invested monthly sums of equal amounts, the investor was positive in June 2003 and by September 2004, the portfolio was up 45% overall. (when the lump sum investor was breaking even). Another aspect to note is the maximum loss, the lump sum investor has suffered a nearly 50% loss by September 2001, comparatively, the SIP portfolio loss was 28% at the same time.
What we can get from the above is that when the stock market is in for a bad period, it's always better to be in a SIP since the recovery is faster and also one sees lower losses in the portfolio too.
Looking at the last 37 years data of the stock market from 1979 to 2016, one deciphers that if one invested early on (1979 - inception time of the BSE Sensex), one hardly saw any negative returns in the portfolio.
A 5-year analysis from August 1979 shows that both the lump sum and Systematic Investment Plan portfolios posted hardly any loss in any time period from there. As one can see from the graph below, both portfolios posted handsome profits year-on-year. At the end of every year, the lump sum portfolio overtook the SIP portfolio and increased the lead margin too.
Hence, in case the market is expected to go one way up, the lump sum is always the better option.
While we can analyse all periods of the stock market, can we really decide which is better? The answer to this varies from individual to individual, the cash flows, investing(or holding) periods, outgoing cash flows or requirements etc. SIPs are a great tool to inculcate the habit of savings, they channelize the investment of individuals into the stock market. One also has to plan for investing for the long term if you plan to invest in equities, where we clearly know that the ability to generate returns increases with time. Also, if one feels the markets may be choppy and not a straight line up, then SIPs are a great tool to enter the market. Additionally, data shows that SIPs also ensure that the investor suffers lower losses at any time.
In case there is feeling that the market would be secular (one way!) on the upside, in that situation, lump sum investing would be the way to go.
(Erstwhile Motilal Oswal MOSt Focused Midcap 30 Fund) The investment objective of the Scheme is to achieve long term capital appreciation by investing in a maximum of 30 quality mid-cap companies having long-term competitive advantages and potential for growth. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that the investment objective of the Scheme would be achieved. Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund is a Equity - Mid Cap fund was launched on 24 Feb 14. It is a fund with Moderately High risk and has given a Below is the key information for Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund Returns up to 1 year are on The investment objective of the scheme is to provide long term growth from a portfolio of equity / equity related instruments of companies engaged either directly or indirectly in the infrastructure sector. LIC MF Infrastructure Fund is a Equity - Sectoral fund was launched on 29 Feb 08. It is a fund with High risk and has given a Below is the key information for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund Returns up to 1 year are on The objective of the scheme would be to provide investors with opportunities for long-term growth in capital along with the liquidity of an open-ended scheme through an active management of investments in a diversified basket of equity stocks of domestic Public Sector Undertakings and in debt and money market instruments issued by PSUs AND others. SBI PSU Fund is a Equity - Sectoral fund was launched on 7 Jul 10. It is a fund with High risk and has given a Below is the key information for SBI PSU Fund Returns up to 1 year are on (Erstwhile Motilal Oswal MOSt Focused Long Term Fund) The investment objective of the Scheme is to generate long-term capital appreciation from a diversified portfolio of predominantly equity and equity related instruments. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that the investment objective of the Scheme would be achieved. Motilal Oswal Long Term Equity Fund is a Equity - ELSS fund was launched on 21 Jan 15. It is a fund with Moderately High risk and has given a Below is the key information for Motilal Oswal Long Term Equity Fund Returns up to 1 year are on T o g e n e r a t e income/capital appreciation by investing in equities and equity related instruments of companies in the infrastructure sector. However, there can be no assurance that the investment objective of the scheme will be realized. Canara Robeco Infrastructure is a Equity - Sectoral fund was launched on 2 Dec 05. It is a fund with High risk and has given a Below is the key information for Canara Robeco Infrastructure Returns up to 1 year are on 1. Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund
CAGR/Annualized
return of 24.4% since its launch. Ranked 27 in Mid Cap
category. Return for 2023 was 41.7% , 2022 was 10.7% and 2021 was 55.8% . Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund
Growth Launch Date 24 Feb 14 NAV (19 Nov 24) ₹104.202 ↑ 1.59 (1.55 %) Net Assets (Cr) ₹20,056 on 31 Oct 24 Category Equity - Mid Cap AMC Motilal Oswal Asset Management Co. Ltd Rating ☆☆☆ Risk Moderately High Expense Ratio 0.66 Sharpe Ratio 2.88 Information Ratio 1.19 Alpha Ratio 19.69 Min Investment 5,000 Min SIP Investment 500 Exit Load 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL) Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Oct 19 ₹10,000 31 Oct 20 ₹9,551 31 Oct 21 ₹16,394 31 Oct 22 ₹19,861 31 Oct 23 ₹23,514 31 Oct 24 ₹39,059 Returns for Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund
absolute basis
& more than 1 year are on CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)
basis. as on 19 Nov 24 Duration Returns 1 Month -3.1% 3 Month 4.7% 6 Month 24.3% 1 Year 57.3% 3 Year 32% 5 Year 31.4% 10 Year 15 Year Since launch 24.4% Historical performance (Yearly) on absolute basis
Year Returns 2023 41.7% 2022 10.7% 2021 55.8% 2020 9.3% 2019 9.7% 2018 -12.7% 2017 30.8% 2016 5.2% 2015 16.5% 2014 Fund Manager information for Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund
Name Since Tenure Ajay Khandelwal 1 Oct 24 0.08 Yr. Niket Shah 1 Jul 20 4.34 Yr. Santosh Singh 1 Oct 24 0.08 Yr. Rakesh Shetty 22 Nov 22 1.94 Yr. Sunil Sawant 1 Jul 24 0.34 Yr. Data below for Motilal Oswal Midcap 30 Fund as on 31 Oct 24
Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Consumer Cyclical 28.84% Technology 25.23% Industrials 22.07% Financial Services 9.82% Health Care 5.2% Basic Materials 3.46% Real Estate 2.4% Communication Services 0.59% Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 2.4% Equity 97.6% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity Coforge Ltd (Technology)
Equity, Since 31 Mar 23 | COFORGE10% ₹1,982 Cr 2,600,000
↑ 350,000 Kalyan Jewellers India Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 29 Feb 24 | KALYANKJIL9% ₹1,905 Cr 28,983,719
↑ 3,583,719 Polycab India Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 30 Sep 23 | POLYCAB9% ₹1,863 Cr 2,875,000
↑ 325,000 Persistent Systems Ltd (Technology)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 23 | PERSISTENT8% ₹1,612 Cr 3,000,000
↑ 300,000 Jio Financial Services Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 23 | JIOFIN8% ₹1,612 Cr 50,000,000
↑ 3,226,841 Bajaj Auto Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 24 | 5329777% ₹1,346 Cr 1,367,958
↑ 1,367,958 Tube Investments of India Ltd Ordinary Shares (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 20 | TIINDIA6% ₹1,210 Cr 2,700,000
↑ 232,189 Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 24 | M&M5% ₹1,038 Cr 3,805,755
↑ 3,805,755 Voltas Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 17 | VOLTAS4% ₹825 Cr 5,000,000 Zomato Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 30 Apr 23 | 5433204% ₹786 Cr 32,500,000
↑ 7,500,000 2. LIC MF Infrastructure Fund
CAGR/Annualized
return of 10% since its launch. Return for 2023 was 44.4% , 2022 was 7.9% and 2021 was 46.6% . LIC MF Infrastructure Fund
Growth Launch Date 29 Feb 08 NAV (19 Nov 24) ₹49.1207 ↑ 0.72 (1.49 %) Net Assets (Cr) ₹786 on 31 Oct 24 Category Equity - Sectoral AMC LIC Mutual Fund Asset Mgmt Co Ltd Rating Risk High Expense Ratio 2.3 Sharpe Ratio 2.93 Information Ratio 1.03 Alpha Ratio 26.1 Min Investment 5,000 Min SIP Investment 1,000 Exit Load 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL) Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Oct 19 ₹10,000 31 Oct 20 ₹8,857 31 Oct 21 ₹15,041 31 Oct 22 ₹16,473 31 Oct 23 ₹20,435 31 Oct 24 ₹34,608 Returns for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund
absolute basis
& more than 1 year are on CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)
basis. as on 19 Nov 24 Duration Returns 1 Month -5.1% 3 Month -4.6% 6 Month 10% 1 Year 56.9% 3 Year 29.9% 5 Year 27.1% 10 Year 15 Year Since launch 10% Historical performance (Yearly) on absolute basis
Year Returns 2023 44.4% 2022 7.9% 2021 46.6% 2020 -0.1% 2019 13.3% 2018 -14.6% 2017 42.2% 2016 -2.2% 2015 -6.2% 2014 49.6% Fund Manager information for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund
Name Since Tenure Yogesh Patil 18 Sep 20 4.12 Yr. Mahesh Bendre 1 Jul 24 0.34 Yr. Data below for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund as on 31 Oct 24
Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Industrials 52.08% Basic Materials 11.24% Utility 7.02% Consumer Cyclical 6.98% Financial Services 6.04% Technology 2.96% Real Estate 2.5% Communication Services 2.16% Health Care 1.79% Energy 1.13% Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 5.23% Equity 94.77% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity Garware Hi-Tech Films Ltd (Basic Materials)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 23 | 5006554% ₹35 Cr 86,410
↑ 7,043 Shakti Pumps (India) Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Mar 24 | SHAKTIPUMP4% ₹29 Cr 65,192
↑ 702 Schneider Electric Infrastructure Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 23 | SCHNEIDER3% ₹26 Cr 328,026
↑ 3,536 Cummins India Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 May 21 | 5004803% ₹23 Cr 66,145
↑ 713 REC Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 23 | 5329553% ₹23 Cr 432,722
↑ 149,844 Bharat Bijlee Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 22 | BBL3% ₹22 Cr 47,325
↑ 3,206 GE Vernova T&D India Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 24 | 5222753% ₹21 Cr 120,063
↓ -7,340 Tata Power Co Ltd (Utilities)
Equity, Since 29 Feb 24 | 5004003% ₹21 Cr 473,536
↑ 66,616 ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 24 | 5330333% ₹20 Cr 149,711
↑ 1,614 Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 May 24 | 5001033% ₹20 Cr 838,269
↑ 239,812 3. SBI PSU Fund
CAGR/Annualized
return of 8.1% since its launch. Ranked 31 in Sectoral
category. Return for 2023 was 54% , 2022 was 29% and 2021 was 32.4% . SBI PSU Fund
Growth Launch Date 7 Jul 10 NAV (19 Nov 24) ₹30.661 ↑ 0.02 (0.06 %) Net Assets (Cr) ₹4,471 on 31 Oct 24 Category Equity - Sectoral AMC SBI Funds Management Private Limited Rating ☆☆ Risk High Expense Ratio 2.3 Sharpe Ratio 1.96 Information Ratio -0.44 Alpha Ratio -0.34 Min Investment 5,000 Min SIP Investment 500 Exit Load 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL) Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Oct 19 ₹10,000 31 Oct 20 ₹7,320 31 Oct 21 ₹11,991 31 Oct 22 ₹14,035 31 Oct 23 ₹17,801 31 Oct 24 ₹29,315 Returns for SBI PSU Fund
absolute basis
& more than 1 year are on CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)
basis. as on 19 Nov 24 Duration Returns 1 Month -6.9% 3 Month -9.6% 6 Month -3.4% 1 Year 49.8% 3 Year 33% 5 Year 23.5% 10 Year 15 Year Since launch 8.1% Historical performance (Yearly) on absolute basis
Year Returns 2023 54% 2022 29% 2021 32.4% 2020 -10% 2019 6% 2018 -23.8% 2017 21.9% 2016 16.2% 2015 -11.1% 2014 41.5% Fund Manager information for SBI PSU Fund
Name Since Tenure Rohit Shimpi 1 Jun 24 0.42 Yr. Data below for SBI PSU Fund as on 31 Oct 24
Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Financial Services 36.78% Utility 23.95% Energy 17.87% Industrials 10.89% Basic Materials 7.16% Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 3.36% Equity 96.64% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity State Bank of India (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 10 | SBIN15% ₹679 Cr 8,277,500 Power Grid Corp Of India Ltd (Utilities)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 10 | 5328989% ₹404 Cr 12,585,554 GAIL (India) Ltd (Utilities)
Equity, Since 31 May 24 | 5321558% ₹367 Cr 18,350,000 Bharat Electronics Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 30 Jun 24 | BEL8% ₹341 Cr 11,975,000
↑ 1,600,000 Bharat Petroleum Corp Ltd (Energy)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 24 | 5005476% ₹277 Cr 8,900,000
↑ 700,000 NTPC Ltd (Utilities)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 10 | 5325555% ₹222 Cr 5,443,244 NMDC Ltd (Basic Materials)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 23 | 5263715% ₹206 Cr 9,300,000 Bank of Baroda (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 24 | 5321344% ₹196 Cr 7,800,000 Petronet LNG Ltd (Energy)
Equity, Since 30 Jun 24 | 5325223% ₹137 Cr 4,100,000 General Insurance Corp of India (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 May 24 | GICRE3% ₹133 Cr 3,600,000 4. Motilal Oswal Long Term Equity Fund
CAGR/Annualized
return of 18.1% since its launch. Return for 2023 was 37% , 2022 was 1.8% and 2021 was 32.1% . Motilal Oswal Long Term Equity Fund
Growth Launch Date 21 Jan 15 NAV (19 Nov 24) ₹51.3947 ↑ 0.75 (1.48 %) Net Assets (Cr) ₹4,074 on 31 Oct 24 Category Equity - ELSS AMC Motilal Oswal Asset Management Co. Ltd Rating Risk Moderately High Expense Ratio 0.74 Sharpe Ratio 3.58 Information Ratio 1.56 Alpha Ratio 22.87 Min Investment 500 Min SIP Investment 500 Exit Load NIL Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Oct 19 ₹10,000 31 Oct 20 ₹9,099 31 Oct 21 ₹14,648 31 Oct 22 ₹14,723 31 Oct 23 ₹17,301 31 Oct 24 ₹28,444 Returns for Motilal Oswal Long Term Equity Fund
absolute basis
& more than 1 year are on CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)
basis. as on 19 Nov 24 Duration Returns 1 Month -6.1% 3 Month 0.6% 6 Month 14.6% 1 Year 49.6% 3 Year 23.2% 5 Year 22.7% 10 Year 15 Year Since launch 18.1% Historical performance (Yearly) on absolute basis
Year Returns 2023 37% 2022 1.8% 2021 32.1% 2020 8.8% 2019 13.2% 2018 -8.7% 2017 44% 2016 12.5% 2015 2014 Fund Manager information for Motilal Oswal Long Term Equity Fund
Name Since Tenure Ajay Khandelwal 11 Dec 23 0.89 Yr. Niket Shah 17 Oct 23 1.04 Yr. Santosh Singh 1 Oct 24 0.08 Yr. Rakesh Shetty 22 Nov 22 1.94 Yr. Data below for Motilal Oswal Long Term Equity Fund as on 31 Oct 24
Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Industrials 32.36% Consumer Cyclical 25.26% Financial Services 17.45% Technology 7.49% Real Estate 6.96% Health Care 5.64% Basic Materials 4.32% Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 0.53% Equity 99.47% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity Trent Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 22 | 5002517% ₹303 Cr 425,260 Zomato Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 23 | 5433206% ₹259 Cr 10,702,790
↓ -1,075,547 Kalyan Jewellers India Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 23 | KALYANKJIL5% ₹217 Cr 3,296,932 Inox Wind Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 23 | INOXWIND4% ₹178 Cr 7,946,960 Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd Ordinary Shares (Basic Materials)
Equity, Since 28 Feb 23 | FLUOROCHEM4% ₹176 Cr 408,886 Prestige Estates Projects Ltd (Real Estate)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 23 | PRESTIGE4% ₹173 Cr 1,055,205 Kaynes Technology India Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 30 Jun 23 | KAYNES4% ₹162 Cr 297,751 Suzlon Energy Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 24 | SUZLON4% ₹161 Cr 24,068,813 Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 29 Feb 24 | MCX4% ₹153 Cr 235,083 Apar Industries Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 23 | APARINDS4% ₹149 Cr 148,305 5. Canara Robeco Infrastructure
CAGR/Annualized
return of 15.5% since its launch. Return for 2023 was 41.2% , 2022 was 9% and 2021 was 56.1% . Canara Robeco Infrastructure
Growth Launch Date 2 Dec 05 NAV (19 Nov 24) ₹153.42 ↑ 0.96 (0.63 %) Net Assets (Cr) ₹848 on 31 Oct 24 Category Equity - Sectoral AMC Canara Robeco Asset Management Co. Ltd. Rating Risk High Expense Ratio 2.47 Sharpe Ratio 2.54 Information Ratio 0 Alpha Ratio 0 Min Investment 5,000 Min SIP Investment 1,000 Exit Load 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL) Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Oct 19 ₹10,000 31 Oct 20 ₹9,008 31 Oct 21 ₹16,390 31 Oct 22 ₹18,486 31 Oct 23 ₹21,810 31 Oct 24 ₹35,302 Returns for Canara Robeco Infrastructure
absolute basis
& more than 1 year are on CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)
basis. as on 19 Nov 24 Duration Returns 1 Month -8.4% 3 Month -5.4% 6 Month 3% 1 Year 48.9% 3 Year 26.5% 5 Year 28.2% 10 Year 15 Year Since launch 15.5% Historical performance (Yearly) on absolute basis
Year Returns 2023 41.2% 2022 9% 2021 56.1% 2020 9% 2019 2.3% 2018 -19.1% 2017 40.2% 2016 2.1% 2015 6.7% 2014 69.9% Fund Manager information for Canara Robeco Infrastructure
Name Since Tenure Vishal Mishra 26 Jun 21 3.35 Yr. Shridatta Bhandwaldar 29 Sep 18 6.09 Yr. Data below for Canara Robeco Infrastructure as on 31 Oct 24
Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Industrials 47.56% Utility 12.52% Energy 8.52% Technology 7.58% Financial Services 6.13% Basic Materials 5.74% Communication Services 3.16% Real Estate 1.74% Consumer Cyclical 1.68% Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 5.38% Equity 94.62% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity NTPC Ltd (Utilities)
Equity, Since 30 Nov 18 | 5325555% ₹46 Cr 1,131,666
↑ 100,000 Larsen & Toubro Ltd (Industrials)
Equity, Since 28 Feb 11 | LT5% ₹45 Cr 123,401
↓ -20,000 Reliance Industries Ltd (Energy)
Equity, Since 30 Apr 22 | RELIANCE4% ₹33 Cr 244,750 Power Grid Corp Of India Ltd (Utilities)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 09 | 5328984% ₹31 Cr 977,546 Hitachi Energy India Ltd Ordinary Shares (Technology)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 23 | POWERINDIA4% ₹30 Cr 21,500
↓ -1,500 Tata Power Co Ltd (Utilities)
Equity, Since 30 Sep 24 | 5004003% ₹29 Cr 650,000
↑ 250,000 Bharti Airtel Ltd (Communication Services)
Equity, Since 31 May 24 | BHARTIARTL3% ₹27 Cr 166,100 State Bank of India (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 24 | SBIN3% ₹26 Cr 320,000 Power Finance Corp Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 30 Nov 23 | 5328103% ₹26 Cr 565,000 Dixon Technologies (India) Ltd (Technology)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 23 | DIXON3% ₹25 Cr 17,450
↑ 2,000
The final choice to invest via the lump sum route or SIPs would be a culmination of many factors, however, the investor needs to take into account all these and his/her risk appetite to choose the best route. Choose well, choose wisely, stay invested!